Effectiveness of Recapitulation of Stages of Labor Model for Learning Ability for BSc Nursing Students in Selected Colleges at Puducherry, India
V Poongodi, M Annie Annal, R Umamaheswari, G Nivetha
Effectiveness, Labor, Learning ability, ROSOL model
Citation Information :
Poongodi V, Annal MA, Umamaheswari R, Nivetha G. Effectiveness of Recapitulation of Stages of Labor Model for Learning Ability for BSc Nursing Students in Selected Colleges at Puducherry, India. 2020; 13 (1):4-6.
During the physiological process of labor, from the uterus the fetus, membranes, umbilical cord, and placenta are expelled out. Background: The successful practice of tracking the learning activities based on the research literature is the fundamental component of high quality education. Aim: To evaluate the effectiveness of the recapitulation of stages of labor (ROSOL) model on learning ability of final-year BSc nursing students. Materials and methods: The research approach was quantitative and one-group pretest—posttest preexperimental research design. A total of 90 students from BSc nursing final year, Kasturba Gandhi Nursing College, Puducherry, was selected by the purposive sampling technique. The pretest level of knowledge was assessed by a structured knowledge questionnaire and the ROSOL model was issued to the students. After 7 days, the posttest level of knowledge was assessed by using same structured knowledge questionnaires. Descriptive and inferential statistics like frequency, percentage, mean, standard deviation, and the Wilcoxon signed-rank test were used for analyzing the data. Results: In pretest, 40 (44.4%) had inadequate knowledge, 48 (53.3%) had moderately adequate knowledge, and 2 (2.2%) had adequate knowledge. In posttest, 1 had inadequate and moderately adequate knowledge and 90 (100%) had adequate knowledge. The mean value was 9.81 and 17.68 during pre- and posttest, respectively. The median value was 10 and 18 during pre- and posttest, respectively. The obtained Wilcoxon signed-rank test value was 8.265. The improvement of knowledge was assessed using the paired t-test; it was found statistically significant at p < 0.001 level. Conclusion: The ROSOL model was effective in improving the learning ability among final-year BSc nursing students.
Lunze K, Bloom DE, Jamison DT, Hamer DH. The global burden of neonatal hypothermia: systematic review of a major challenge for newborn survival. BMC Med 2013;11(1):24. DOI: 10.1186/1741-7015- 11-24.
World Health Organisation. Education material for teachers of midwifery: midwifery education modules (PDF). 2nd ed., Geneva [Switzerland]: World Health Organisation; 2008. p. 3.
Memon HU, Handa VL. Vaginal childbirth and pelvic floor disorders. Women's Health 2013;9(3):265–277. quiz 276–277 10.2217/WHE.13.17.
Martin RJ, Fanaroff AA, Walsh MC. Fanaroff and Martin's Neonatal-Perinatal Medicine: Diseases of the Fetus and Infant. Elsevier Health Sciences, p. 116.
Martin E. Concise Colour Medical l.p. Dictionary. Oxford University Press; 2015. p. 375.
Dutta DC. Text Book of Obstetrics. 6th ed., Calcutta: New Central Book Agency; 2004. pp. 115–116.
Fraser, Cooper. Myles Text Book for Midwives. 14th ed., London: Churchill Livingstone; 2005. pp. 246–248.
“The World Factbook”. www.cia.gov. July 11, 2016. Archived from the original on 16 November 2016. Retrieved 30 July 2016.
Olsen O, Clausen JA. Planned hospital birth versus planned home birth. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2012(9):CD000352. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD000352.pub2.
Pillitteri A. Maternal and Child Health Nursing. 5th ed., Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams and Wilkins Publication; 2007.
Preterm birth Fact sheet No 363”. WHO. November 2015. Archived from the original on 7 March 2015. Retrieved 30 July 2016.
de Fossard E, Bailey M. Communication for Behavior Change: Volume lll: Using Entertainment–Education for Distance Education. India: SAGE Publications; 2016.
Buck GM, Platt RW. Reproductive and Perinatal Epidemiology. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2011. p. 163.
“Birth”. The Columbia Electronic Encyclopedia (6 ed.). Columbia University Press. 2016. Archived from the original on 2016-03-06. Retrieved 2016-07-30 – via Encyclopedia.com.
International Confederation of Midwives; International Federation of Gynaecologists Obstetricians. Joint statement: management of the third stage of labour to prevent post-partum haemorrhage. J Midwifery Womens Health 2004;49(1):76–77. DOI: 10.1111/j.1542-2011.2004.tb04420.x.
Co-Operation, Organisation for Economic Development. Doing Better for Children. Paris: OECD; 2009. p. 105.
“Pregnancy Labor and Birth”. Women's Health. September 27, 2010. Archived from the original on 28 July 2016. Retrieved 31 July 2016.
National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. “Intrapartum care: care of healthy women and their babies during childbirth”. National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. Archived from the original on 18 February 2015. Retrieved 11 February 2015.
McDonald SJ, Middleton P, Dowswell T, Morris PS. Effect of timing of umbilical cord clamping of term infants on maternal and neonatal outcomes. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2013;7(7):CD004074. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD004074.pub3.
Jangsten E, Mattsson LÅ, Lyckestam I, Hellström AL, et al. A comparison of active management and expectant management of the third stage of labour: a Swedish randomised controlled trial. BJOG 2011;118(3):362–369. DOI: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2010.02800.x.
Rajeshwari R, Vijayalakshmi. Child birth baboon or a bane. J Nightingale Nurs Times 2013;7(9):4–6.
Geetha CR. Pregnancy and childbirth. J Midwifery Nurs 2013(3):15.
Satin AJ, (July 1, 2013). “Latent phase of labor”. UpToDate. Wolters Kluwer. Archived from the original on March 3, 2016.